Tram Town
Monday, February 07, 2005
Category: DNA This story from The Hun declares: The State Government has admitted many Victorian parents are unaware DNA samples taken from their child at birth were to be stored in the gene bank.Not the consent of this parent! And... Since population-wide testing began in the 1960s, hospital staff have been required to obtain verbal consent from parents and guardians before performing the procedure.Verbal consent for a reasonably complex issue from a woman just coming out of labour... WHAT BULLSHIT! Anyway, I was there for the birth of both of my children and no such consent was requested. How about other recent parents? What is your memory? Also, how many parents understood the implications of this collection when/if their consent was requested during the mid-1960's? Why were they doing this at that stage? Did they presage DNA testing? Something is very strange about this whole story! UPDATE: The TTT was talking about this same story on Jose day last year: A child's birth is a special moment - the labour, the joy, the chaos. And about 48 hours into a new life, each baby has a medical test that has saved countless children's lives.Am I just being naive here or is this a disgrace? |